Start Bootstrap Logo

Trends Sci. 2025; 22(6): 9757


Mechanistic Insights into the Anti-Urolithiatic Potential of Ecbolium viride Ethanolic Extract: In Silico Targeting of Human Glyoxylate Reductase Hydroxypyruvate Reductase and Adenine Phosphoribosyltransferase, Supported by In Vitro Validation


V. Prabhakar1,*, R. Arulkumar2, S. Mohamed Akram Ali3, A. Vijayalakshmi4,

P. Suresh Kumar2, Syed Abuthahir Badusha5, K. Sriram1 and K. U. Rathinisha6


1Department of Pharmacology, Sri Shanmugha College of Pharmacy (Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University), Salem 637304, Tamil Nadu, India

2Department of Pharmaceutics, Sri Shanmugha College of Pharmacy (Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University), Salem 637304, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

3Department of Pharmacy Practice, Sri Shanmugha College of Pharmacy (Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University), Salem 637304, Tamil Nadu, India

4Department of Pharmacognosy, Vels Institute of Science, Technology & Advanced Studies, Tamil Nadu, India

5Department of pharmaceutics, Vellalar College of Pharmacy, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India

6Department of Pharmacy Practice, Thanthai Rovers College of Pharmacy (Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University), Perambalur 621212, Tamil Nadu, India


(*Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected])


Received: 11 January 2025, Revised: 10 March 2025, Accepted: 17 March 2025, Published: 5 May 2025


Abstract

Urolithiasis is characterized by the formation of urinary stones and represents a significant global health burden, frequently necessitating invasive treatments and leading to recurrent symptoms. Due to the limitations of conventional therapies, there is a growing interest in alternative treatments, especially those based on traditional herbs. This research examines the therapeutic potential of Ecbolium viride leaves for urolithiasis by conducting a thorough evaluation that encompasses phytochemical screening, GC-MS analysis, in silico molecular docking, and in vitro assays for anti-urolithiasis. Phytochemical screening demonstrated the presence of bioactive compounds, such as alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, and polyphenols, which are acknowledged for their pharmacological properties. GC-MS analysis further characterized these phytoconstituents, identifying compounds with potential anti-urolithiasis activity. In silico molecular docking studies revealed significant binding affinities between these compounds and target proteins associated with stone formation, indicating their potential to disrupt the molecular mechanisms of urolithiasis. In vitro assays, such as nucleation, aggregation, and dissolution studies, demonstrated the extract’s substantial ability to inhibit the formation and aggregation of calcium oxalate crystals, as well as to enhance crystal dissolution. The results from these methodologies provide substantial evidence that Ecbolium viride leaves may serve as a natural agent for managing urolithiasis. This research endorses the application of plant-derived compounds as substitutes for traditional treatments of urolithiasis. Further in vivo studies and clinical trials are necessary to confirm the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of Ecbolium viride in the treatment of urolithiasis.


Keywords: Urolithiasis, Ecbolium viride, Phytochemical screening, GC-MS analysis, Molecular docking, In vitro assays, Calcium oxalate crystals, Anti-urolithiasis activity




Introduction

Urolithiasis, or kidney stones, is a common health problem around the world. Biochemical imbalances in urine produce kidney or urinary tract stones. Pain, hemorrhage, and renal failure can result from these


stones. Therefore, preventing and addressing this issue is vital [1]. At 5 - 15 % prevalence, it costs the US about 2 billion dollars in healthcare annually, according to study. Obesity, diabetes, salt intake, and climate change enhance stone development. The lifetime risk of kidney stones is 12 % for males and 6 % for women. Recurrent kidney stones increase the risk of ESRD and all-cause mortality. [2,3] Calcium oxalate stones, which form in urine due to dehydration or high oxalate ingestion, are the most common. High calcium and phosphate levels from metabolic illnesses like hyperparathyroidism create calcium phosphate stones. Kidney stone formation is primarily caused by super saturation, crystal nucleation, and growth [4-7]. Stone super saturation occurs when calcium and oxalate ions are high. This will cause crystal nucleation. Osteopontin, a protein, can help crystals adhere and aggregate, but macrophage-driven inflammation, also, oxidative stress promotes stone formation. Acidic urine from hyperuricosuria and low pH causes uric acid stones. Urease-producing bacteria cause urinary tract infections, alkaline urine, and struvite stones. Cysteine stones result from tubule cysteine reabsorption problems. Changes in epigenetic, gene expression, and gut microbiota alter ion handling and oxalate breakdown, increasing stone risk. Stone formation involves genetic, metabolic, inflammatory, and microbiologic factors. Crystal retention and growth are also caused by inflammation and oxidative damage [8-12]. Hydration, food, and drugs treat urolithiasis. Fluid ingestion dilutes urine, causing stone formation and small stone passage. Medication depends on stone kind and location. Potassium citrate is the most frequent urine alkalizer. This dissolves uric acid stones and prevents calcium oxalate [13-18]. Diuretics like hydrochlorothiazide diminish calcium excretion, preventing calcium-based stones. Alpha-blockers like tamsulosin relax urinary tract muscles, making stones easier to pass. [19-21] larger stones may require ureteroscopy, shockwave lithotripsy, or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Recurrence and negative effects persist despite these therapies, therefore herbal medicine is gaining popularity. Chancapiedra (Phyllanthus niruri) reduces calcium oxalate crystallisation; coriander (Coriandrum sativum) has diuretic and anti-inflammatory properties; horsetail (Equisetum arvense) has silica, which may dissolve stones and prevent crystals. The Acanthaceae family is renowned for its diverse therapeutic characteristics, and a number of plants within it exhibit substantial antiurolithiatic activity. The potential of plants like Andrographis paniculata, Barleria prionitis, and Hygrophila spinosa to prevent the formation of kidney stones has been extensively investigated. These herbs need additional controlled clinical trials to prove their safety and efficacy [22-25]. Ecbolium viride, a traditional medicinal herb, possesses anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and diuretic properties. Despite its widespread use in traditional medicine, its urolithiasis prevention and treatment potential is untapped [26]. Ecbolium viride leaves’ bioactive compounds may inhibit crystal formation, reduce oxidative stress, and increase urine flow, thereby minimizing stone formation and facilitating breakdown. This study shows how important Ecbolium viride is as a possible ingredient for making new medicines to treat urolithiasis. This is shown by its phytochemical profile, GC-MS analysis, and the fact that it works well both in silico and in vitro. The found bioactive substances may facilitate stone prevention by suppressing crystal formation.


Materials and methods

Collection and authentication of plant material

Ecbolium viride leaves were gathered from the natural areas around Aravakurichi with the local consent and in accordance with institutional, national, and international standards, such as the IUCN Policy Statement and CITE rules. After species confirmation, the Botanical Survey of India in Coimbatore has kept a voucher specimen (BSI/SRC/5/23/2024/Tech-12) for future use. To remove any microbiological contamination, the leaves were thoroughly rinsed in filtered water before being treated with a 10 % potassium permanganate solution. They were then ground into a fine powder for later use and allowed to dry in the shade.

Preparation of extract

The powdered leaves underwent Soxhlet extraction using ethanol and water in a 70:30 ratio. Following extraction it was then evaporated by rotary evaporator at 40 - 50 °C under decreased pressure. The concentrated extract was then filtered via Whatman filter paper to eliminate any leftover solid particles. Finally, the extract was collected, sealed in appropriate containers, and stored in a cool, dry location for future examination [27].

Preliminary phytochemical analysis

The preliminary phytochemical analysis was performed using the Khandelwal technique standard methodology to detect the numerous secondary metabolites [28-35].


GC-MS analysis

The hydro alcoholic extract of Ecbolium viridae was analysed for its phytochemical composition by Shimadzu 17A gas chromatography (GC) system equipped with a Shimadzu QP2010 Plus mass spectrometer. The electron ionisation (EI) technique was used on a 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm DB-5 fused silica column in the GC-MS method. After 5 min at 50 °C, the oven temperature was progressively increased to 280 °C over the course of 40 min. The carrier gas was high-purity helium flowing at a rate of 2 mL/min. The 1 µL sample injection was subjected to a split ratio of 1:30, and MS analysis was performed with an ionisation voltage of 70 eV. The phytochemicals were identified by comparing the obtained mass spectra to the NIST library database, a credible source of mass spectral data. Spectral matching was done to verify the compounds, requiring a minimum match percentage of 85 % to guarantee the accuracy and reliability of the identification. [36].


In silico docking studies

Protein preparation

The RCSB Protein Data Bank was used to get the crystal structures of 2 proteins that are important for urolithiasis: Human Adenine Phosphoribosyltransferase (PDB: 1ORE) with a resolution of 2.10 Å and Human Glyoxylate Reductase Hydroxypyruvate Reductase (PDB: 2WWR) with a resolution of 2.82 Å. The BIOVIA software made it easier to get rid of water molecules and heteroatom, and it also added polar hydrogen atoms to the targets and stored the proteins in the ‘pdb’ format. Figures 1(A) - 1(B) presents the prepared protein structures.




Figure 1 (A): Prepared protein of human adenine phosphoribosyltransferase and (B): Prepared protein of human glyoxylate reductase hydroxypyruvate reductase.


Ligand preparation

In total, 138 compounds were identified in the GC-MS analysis of Ecbolium viride, of which 81 were characterized using ADME analysis. Subsequently, 31 compounds were selected for further study through PROTOX analysis (Tables 1 and 2). The PubChem database was used to obtain the structures of all phytoconstituents in ‘sdf’ format. The chemical structures of the 31 phytoconstituents and standard drugs, including Allopurinol, Febuxostat, Hydrochlorothiazide, Penicillamine, Potassium Citrate, Tamsulosin, and Tiopronin, were converted to ‘pdb’ format by adding polar groups to the ligands using BIOVIA software.



Table 1 The GC-MS analysis of extract of Ecbolium viride leaves.

S. No.

Retention time

Chemical compound

Molecular formula

9.455

(S)-Tetrahydrofuran-3-ol

C4H8O2

9.039

Tri methyl ammonium acetate hydrochloride

C5H12ClNO2

7.778

4-Methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-1

C4H6O3

17.103

3-Ethyl-2,5-dimethyl-1,3-hexadiene

C10H18

9.282

1,4-Anhydrohexitol

C6H12O5

19.681

(3S,7Z)-3,7,11-Trimethyldodeca-1,6,10-trien-3-ol

C15H26O

7.208

3,3-Dimethyl-4-(di methyl amino)-2-phenylbutan-2-ol

C14H23NO

27.774

Tetradecan-2-1

C14H28O

20.137

3,3,5,5-Tetramethylcyclohexan-1-ol

C10H20O

25.003

(Z)-Tetradec-7-enal

C14H26O

12.920

Ethyl (4-methoxycyclohexylidene)acetate

C11H18O3

8.400

2,7-Dimethyloct-7-en-5-yn-4-yl acetoxyacetate

C14H20O4

12.106

2,3-Dihydrobenzofuran

C8H8O

16.580

exo-1,2-Dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl acetate

C11H18O2

20.421

cis-6-Iodo-2-methylbicyclo[3.3.0]octan-3-1

C9H13IO

13.971

Hexyl 3-methylbutanoate

C11H22O2

16.726

2,2-Dimethyl-3-(2-methylprop-1-enyl)cyclopropanecarboxylic acid

C19H26O3

11.186

Decyl prop-1-en-2-yl carbonate

C14H26O3

13.136

Tetradecyl prop-1-en-2-yl carbonate

C18H34O3

12.760

Decanoic acid

C10H20O2

18.000

Dodecanoic acid

C12H24O2

5.336

2-Isopropoxyethanol

C5H12O2

7.115

2-Methylhex-3-yl formate

C8H16O2

18.229

3-Methylbutyl heptanoate

C12H24O2

25.677

Methyl (10E,12Z)-octadeca-10,12-dienoate

C19H34O2

7.390

2,6-Dimethylpiperazine

C6H14N2

8.772

1,1,3-Triethoxypropane

C9H20O3

4.426

1,1-Diethoxy-2-methylpropane

C8H18O2

21.076

Tetradecanoic acid

C14H28O2

18.742

Undecanal

C11H22O

28.164

(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z)-Icosa-5,8,11,14,17-pentaenoic acid

C20H30O2




Table 2 Lipinski’s rule for chemical compounds of Ecbolium viride extract by SwissADME predictor.

S. No.

Compound

Molecular

weight (g/mol)

Hydrogen

bond donor

Hydrogen bond acceptor

LogP

Molar

refractivity

(S)-Tetrahydrofuran-3-ol

88.11

1

2

0.17

21.47

Tri methyl ammonium acetate hydrochloride

153.61


0


2


1.34

35.32


4-Methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-1

102.09

0

3

0.37

21.99

3-Ethyl-2,5-dimethyl-1,3-hexadiene

138.25

0

0

3.50

49.24

1,4-Anhydrohexitol

164.16

4

5

1.52

34.57

(3S,7Z)-3,7,11-Trimethyldodeca-1,6,10-trien-3-ol

222.37

1

1

4.18

74.00

3,3-Dimethyl-4-(di methyl amino)-2-phenylbutan-2-ol

221.34

1

2

2.54

68.74

Tetradecan-2-1

212.37

0

1

4.62

69.61

3,3,5,5-Tetramethylcyclohexan-1-ol

156.27

1

1

2.59

48.71

(Z)-Tetradec-7-enal

210.36

0

1

4.37

69.14

Ethyl (4-methoxycyclohexylidene)acetate

198.26

0

3

2.02

54.77

2,7-Dimethyloct-7-en-5-yn-4-yl acetoxyacetate

252.31

0

4

2.80

69.67

2,3-Dihydrobenzofuran

221.25

1

3

2.15

60.13

exo-1,2-Dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl acetate

182.26

0

2

2.54

51.83

cis-6-Iodo-2-methylbicyclo[3.3.0]octan-3-1

264.10

0

1

2.52

54.31

Hexyl 3-methylbutanoate

186.29

0

2

3.21

56.28

2,2-Dimethyl-3-(2-methylprop-1-enyl)cyclopropanecarboxylic acid

350.45

0

3

5.24

104.43

Decyl prop-1-en-2-yl carbonate

242.35

0

3

4.37

71.70

Tetradecyl prop-1-en-2-yl carbonate

242.35

0

3

4.37

71.70

Decanoic acid

172.26

1

2

3.00

51.96

Dodecanoic acid

200.32

1

2

3.51

61.57

2-Isopropoxyethanol

104.15

1

2

0.58

28.40

2-Methylhex-3-yl formate

144.21

0

2

2.16

42.24

3-Methylbutyl heptanoate

200.32

0

2

3.59

61.08

Methyl (10E,12Z)-octadeca-10,12-dienoate

294.47

0

2

5.97

93.78

2,6-Dimethylpiperazine

427.54

2

6

2.41

129.51

1,1,3-Triethoxypropane

176.25

0

3

1.83

48.63

1,1-Diethoxy-2-methylpropane

146.23

0

2

2.02

42.74

Tetradecanoic acid

146.23

0

2

2.02

42.74

Undecanal

170.29

0

1

3.55

55.19

(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z)-Icosa-5,8,11,14,17-pentaenoic acid

302.45

1

2

5.99

97.66

Molecular docking

Molecular docking studies were conducted on all phytoconstituents and standard drugs against the Human Adenine Phosphoribosyltransferase and Human Glyoxylate Reductase Hydroxypyruvate Reductase targets using the PyRx tool of autodockvina software. PyRx software is used to open the prepared protein and ligands, minimize all of the ligands, and convert the protein and ligand into the “PDBQT” format. The docking technique was then conducted after generating the grid parameter configuration file. The standard drugs were compared to the binding energies of all the phytoconstituents that were saved.


Analysis and visualization

Biovia Drug Discovery Studio was used to visualize the 2D and 3D structures of compounds with the highest binding affinities, as well as to validate the amino acid interactions.


ADMET prediction analysis

Important filter criteria for predicting the drug-like properties and also monitoring the safety and effectiveness of the compounds are absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity studies. With the help of computational data, it may help to lower the failure of compounds in the experimental evaluation, and it is also cost-effective and time-consuming. We looked into physiochemical and pharmacokinetic properties using SWISS ADME and PREADMET software, as well as bioactivity prediction set up by MOLINSPIRATION software. We also looked into toxicity using PROTOX-II software [37].




In vitro anti-urolithiasis activity

Nucleation assay

A buffer solution was made up with 0.05 M Tris-HCl and 0.15 M NaCl at pH 6.5, accompanied by distinct solutions of 5 mM calcium chloride and 7.5 M sodium oxalate. To commence the crystallization process, 9 mL of calcium chloride solution was combined with 1 mL of the extract at varying concentrations (100, 200, 400, 800, and 1600 μg/mL). Subsequently, 950 mL of sodium oxalate solution was included into the mixture. The temperature was sustained at 37 °C during the operation. After 30 min, the optical density of the solution was assessed at 620 nm. The nucleation rate was assessed by analyzing the induction time of samples containing the extract and Cystone, relative to ones devoid of these components [38]. Crystal growth was anticipated to transpire in the subsequent reaction.


Aggregation assay

The aggregation method was altered and evaluated utilizing a multiple electrode aggregometer, as delineated by Atmani et al. [39]. Calcium oxalate crystals were employed at a concentration of 0.8 mg/mL in a buffered solution comprising 0.05 M Tris–HCl and 0.15 M NaCl at pH 6.5. The experiments were conducted at 37 °C, with or without the addition of test or control samples. The aggregation inhibition percentage was determined by comparing the turbidity of test samples at different concentrations (100, 200, 400, 800, and 1600 μg/mL) to that of the control, employing the subsequent formula:


Egg membrane assay

Semi-permeable membranes preparation

The apex of each egg was perforated using a glass rod to facilitate the removal of its contents. The empty eggshells were then meticulously washed with distilled water and subsequently placed in a beaker containing a 2 M hydrochloric acid solution for decalcification, which was allowed to proceed overnight. This process effectively dissolved the calcium carbonate, leaving the semi permeable membrane intact. The membranes were carefully extracted, thoroughly rinsed with distilled water, and subjected to neutralization through immersion in an ammonia solution. After neutralization, the membranes were again rinsed with distilled water to eliminate any residual acid. To preserve their structural integrity and prevent dehydration, the membranes were stored under controlled conditions in a refrigerated environment, with the pH maintained within the range of 7 to 7.4.


Estimation of calcium oxalate using dissolution model

Each egg’s semi permeable membrane was carefully encased and immersed in a conical flask containing 100 mL of 0.1 M Tris buffer solution, held in place with thread. A stick was positioned at the mouth of the flask, while the opposite end of the thread was secured with aluminum foil to ensure the membrane remained suspended. All conical flasks were incubated at 37 degrees Celsius for duration of 2 h. Following the incubation period, the contents of each membrane were transferred into individual test tubes. Each test tube received 2 mL of 0.5 M sulphuric acid, followed by titration with 0.2 M potassium permanganate (KMnO4) until a faint pink color persisted. The total dissolved calcium oxalate from different concentrations of extracts and standards was determined by subtracting the residual undissolved calcium oxalate from the initial total amount utilised in the experiment. Each millilitre of 0.2 M KMnO4 utilized corresponds to 0.1898 mg of calcium oxalate [40].


Results and discussion

The hydroalcoholic extract of Ecbolium viride leaves was extracted by the Soxhlet extraction method, resulting in a total yield of 20.64 %.


Phytochemical screening

The phytochemical analysis of extract of Ecbolium viride is shown in the Table 3. Alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, glycosides, carbs, amino acids, and polyphenols are some of the important phytochemicals that can be found in Ecbolium viride leaves extract. These findings correspond with prior studies that recognised similar phytochemical studies [41]. These data show that Ecbolium viride is a plant that is high in phytochemicals and could be a source of useful bioactive compounds.




GC-MS analysis

The identification of the phytochemical constituents of Ecbolium viride was performed by GC–MS analysis. Numerous phytocompounds were tentatively identified using the NIST library. Figure 2 show chromatogram. The most abundant peak was observed for n-Hexadecanoic acid, The other characteristic peaks were 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, (Z, Z, Z)-, Phytol, methyl (Z, 12R)-12-acetyloxyoctadec-9-enoate, Neophytadiene.


Figure 2 GC chromatogram of Ecbolium viride leaves extract.



Docking studies

Molecular docking studies are very helpful in identifying the potential compound exhibiting biological activity through the protein and ligand interactions. Pyrx software is a virtual screening tool used for docking studies. In this study, about 32 phytoconstiutents of Ecbolium viride were docked against the 2 targets: Human Adenine Phosphoribosyltransferase (1ORE) and Human Glyoxylate Reductase Hydroxypyruvate Reductase (2WWR) of urolithiasis to identify the lead molecule to combat the kidney stones.

All the ligands exhibit various binding affinities (ΔG kcal/mol) ranging against both the targets. In this Piperazine, 2, 6-dimethyl shows higher affinity of 6.9 kcal/mol in phytoconstituents and Febuxostat shows higher affinity of −6.7 kcal/mol in standard drugs against Human Adenine Phosphoribosyltransferase are shown in Tables 4 and 5. Whereas against Human Glyoxylate Reductase Hydroxypyruvate Reductase again piperazine, 2, 6-dimethyl shows higher affinity of 7.6 kcal/mol in phyto constituents and Febuxostat shows higher affinity of 7.3 kcal/mol in standard drugs are shown in Tables 4 and 5.

2D & 3D interaction of 2,6-Dimethylpiperazine forms binding interaction with Asp 127 and Febuxostat forms binding interaction with Leu A:162, Ala 131, Val 24 of the active site of the Human Adenine Phosphoribosyltransferase was shown in Figures 3(A) - 3(B). Whereas 2D & 3D interaction of 2,6-Dimethyl piperazine forms binding interaction with Gly D: 84 and Febuxostat forms binding interaction with Leu B:59, His B:293 of the active site of the Human Glyoxylate Reductase/ Hydroxypyruvate Reductase were shown in the Figures 4(A) - 4(B).







Table 4 Docking score of phytocompounds.

S. No.

Phytoconstituents

Binding affinity

(1ORE)

Binding affinity

(2WWR)

1

(S)-Tetrahydrofuran-3-ol

3.3

3.5

2

Tri methyl ammonium acetate hydrochloride

3.8

3.5

3

4-Methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-1

3.9

3.5

4

3-Ethyl-2,5-dimethyl-1,3-hexadiene

4.6

4.5

5

1,4-Anhydrohexitol

5

5.4

6

(3S,7Z)-3,7,11-Trimethyldodeca-1,6,10-trien-3-ol

5.2

5.1

7

3,3-Dimethyl-4-(di methyl amino)-2-phenylbutan-2-ol

5.4

6.1

8

Tetradecan-2-1

4.6

4.8

9

3,3,5,5-Tetramethylcyclohexan-1-ol

5.1

5.6

10

(Z)-Tetradec-7-enal

4.9

4.6

11

Ethyl (4-methoxycyclohexylidene)acetate

5.1

5.2

12

2,7-Dimethyloct-7-en-5-yn-4-yl acetoxyacetate

1.1

1.2

13

2,3-Dihydrobenzofuran

5.9

5.9

14

exo-1,2-Dimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl acetate

5.1

5.5

15

cis-6-Iodo-2-methylbicyclo[3.3.0]octan-3-1

4.9

5.1

16

Hexyl 3-methylbutanoate

4.3

4.7

17

2,2-Dimethyl-3-(2-methylprop-1-enyl)cyclopropanecarboxylic acid

6.4

6.4

18

Decyl prop-1-en-2-yl carbonate

5.1

4.5

19

Tetradecyl prop-1-en-2-yl carbonate

5.2

4.8

20

Decanoic acid

4.6

4.8

21

Dodecanoic acid

4.5

4.6

22

2-Isopropoxyethanol

3.3

3.4

23

2-Methylhex-3-yl formate

3.8

4.1

24

3-Methylbutyl heptanoate

4.2

4.5

25

Methyl (10E,12Z)-octadeca-10,12-dienoate

4.7

5.1

26

2,6-Dimethylpiperazine

6.9

7.6

27

1,1,3-Triethoxypropane

3.4

3.5

28

1,1-Diethoxy-2-methylpropane

3.9

3.9

29

Tetradecanoic acid

4.6

4.8

30

Undecanal

4.2

4.3

31

(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z)-Icosa-5,8,11,14,17-pentaenoic acid

5.2

5







Table 5 Docking score of Standard drugs.

S. No.

Phytoconstituents

Binding affinity

(1ORE)

Binding affinity

(2WWR)

1

Febuxostat

6.7

6

2

Hydrochlorothiazide

6.5

7.3

3

Tamsulosin

6.1

6.2

4

Allopurinol

5.5

4.1

5

Tiopronin

4.3

1.7

6

Penicillamine

4.1

6.2

7

Potassium Citrate

1.2

4.5



Figure 3 Interactions of 2,6-Dimethylpiperazine with human adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (1ORE); (A) 2D structure and (B) 3D Structure.



Figure 4 Interactions of febuxostat with human glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase (2WWR); (A) 2D structure and (B) 3D structure.



In vitro anti Urolithiasis activity

Nucleation assay

The stages of stone production include nucleation, crystallization, and aggregation. As a result, various assays were utilized to evaluate the anti-urolithiatic effectiveness of the combined extract [42]. Cystone is utilized for the treatment of urolithiasis and renal calculi, comprising a combination of several plants, such as Didymocarpus pedicellata, Bergenia ligulata and Gokshura. Palaniyamma and Jeyaraman employed cystone as a standard [43]. Nucleation denotes a thermodynamically driven phase change wherein solutes in a supersaturated solution crystallize spontaneously. A marked reduction in the nucleation of calcium oxalate (CaOx) crystals was observed when using the extract and Cystone, highlighting the extract’s efficacy in inhibiting crystallization in the CaOx crystallization assay. The proposed mechanism underlying the extract’s anti crystallization effect likely involves its capacity to chelate free calcium and oxalate ions, thereby impeding the formation of CaOx complexes. The polymorphism of calcium oxalate, a phenomenon of considerable importance, is frequently encountered in urolithiasis and plays a critical role in the formation and growth of renal stones. Figure 5 illustrate the results of the nucleation inhibition activity of Ecbolium viridae extract under In vitro conditions. The inhibitory efficacy of Ecbolium viridae extract reached 82.3 ± 1.44 % at a dose of 1600 μg/mL. The inhibitory effect has been amplified by elevating the concentration. A statistical investigation using the Student's t-test revealed a significant difference between Cystone and the extract (p < 0.05). The extract may be anti-urolithiatic, but less so than Cystone. The results of the nucleation experiment confirmed that the extract included compounds that impede nucleation, hence averting the development of kidney stones.



Figure 5 Effect of Ecbolium viride and Cystone on nucleation.


Aggregation assay

Aggregation is the second most critical factor in the formation of kidney stones. It is the mechanism that enhances the dimensions, composition, and structure of urinary calculi [45]. The aggregation of crystals refers to the process in which several crystals in a solution coalesce and attach to create enormous crystal clusters. Aggregation is a crucial factor in crystal retention, as substantial crystal agglomerates are responsible for renal tubular blockage, thereby facilitating stone development [44]. Figure 6 illustrates the capacity of Ecbolium viridae extract to dissolve crystals and their effect on calcium oxalate aggregation. While the rate of inhibition elevated with increase in concentration of the extract. Percent inhibition aggregation produced by Ecbolium viride was found to be 70.15 ± 0.24 % comparable to that of Cystone (83.79 ± 0.29 %) at 1600 µg/mL concentration. A Student’s t-test was used to ascertain the type of relationship between Cystone and Ecbolium viridae’s inhibitory capacity at each concentration. According to the statistical analysis's findings, the p-values show that, at every dose examined, the variations in the inhibitory efficiency between Cystone and Ecbolium viridae are statistically significant (p < 0.05). Considering all of this, it can be said that Cystone is far more effective in treating this condition, even if Ecbolium viridae has strong anti-urolithiatic properties.



Figure 6 Effect of Ecbolium viride and Cystone on aggregation.


Dissolution of calcium oxalate crystals by titrimetry assay

The amount of CaOx dissolved was nominated as the indicator to evaluate anti-urolithiatic activity. The findings from the capacity of plant extract to dissolve CaOx crystals can be achieved effectively with a minimal quantity, in contrast to its inhibitory activity [46]. The antiurolithiatic activity of Ecbolium viride aligns with the reported efficacy of other Acanthaceae plants [25]. The dissolution percentage results of CaOx using plant extracts and the standard are presented in Table 6. The dissolution of CaOx with the standard drug was measured at 48.4 ± 0.16 %, representing the highest percentage of dissolution in comparison to the plant extracts. Extract concentrations ranged from 67.22 ± 1.24 % to 46.37 ± 0.57 %, indicating their ability to dissolve CaOx. A lower percentage indicates a more effective breakdown of calcium oxalate crystals. The extract at a concentration of 500 mg/mL has a superior capacity to dissolve calcium oxalate and exhibits demineralization comparable to that of the standard medication Cystone. It’s demonstrated that Ecbolium viride exhibits significant anti-urolithiatic activity by effectively dissolving CaOx crystals, even at minimal concentrations of phytochemicals. The p-values suggest that the difference in dissolution percentages between Cystone and Ecbolium viridae extract is statistically significant (p < 0.05) at all concentrations that were measured.


Table 6 The percentage of dissolution on CaOx crystals by plant extract of Ecbolium viride and standard drugs (cystone).

S.No

Concentration

(mg/mL)

Standard drug (Cystone) dissolution percentage (%)

Test drug (Ecbolium viridae extract)

Dissolution percentage (%)

1

100

63.5 ± 0.40

67.22 ± 1.24

2

200

60.5 ± 0.21

64.22 ± 1.24

3

300

58.7 ± 0.15

60.54 ± 0.76

4

400

52.38 ± 0.26

54.77 ± 0.34

5

500

48.4 ± 0.16

46.37 ± 0.57





Conclusions

This research indicates that Ecbolium viride may serve as a natural remedy for urolithiasis. This is supported by evidence from phytochemical, computational, and in vitro research. In vitro experiments, including nucleation, aggregation, and dissolution of calcium oxalate crystals, confirmed that Ecbolium viride extract significantly prevented calcium oxalate crystal growth and aggregation while favoring their dissolution. Further in vivo and clinical trials investigation is required prior to the potential approval of ecbolium viride as a phytotherapeutic treatment for urolithiasis.


Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Sri Shanmugha College of Pharmacy, India for their unwavering support and encouragement throughout our research work. Their invaluable guidance and resources have been instrumental in the successful completion of this article.


References

[1] R Kachkoul, GB Touimi, GE Mouhri, RE Habbani, M Mohim and A Lahrichi. Urolithiasis: History, epidemiology, aetiologic factors and management. The Malaysian Journal of Pathology 2023; 45(3), 333-352.

[2] CA Wagner. Etiopathogenic factors of urolithiasis. Archivos Espanoles de Urologia 2021; 74(1), 16-23.

[3] P Peerapen and V Thongboonkerd. Kidney stone prevention. Advances in Nutrition 2023; 14(3), 555-569.

[4] VD Coninck, A Skolarikos, P Juliebo-Jones, M Joris, O Traxer and EX Keller. Advancements in stone classification: Unveiling the beauty of urolithiasis. World Journal of Urology 2024; 42(1), 46.

[5] M Corrales, S Doizi, Y Barghouthy, O Traxer and M Daudon. Classification of stones according to michel daudon: A narrative review. European Urology Focus 2021; 7(1), 13-21.

[6] AV Kustov, AI Strelnikov, EV Lyalyakina, MA Moriganov and TV Kustova. Renal stones: Classification, structure, methods of analysis. From Chemistry Towards Technology Step-By-Step 2021; 2(1), 97-110.

[7] S Choong, JDL Rosette, J Denstedt, G Zeng, K Sarıca, G Mazzon, I Saltirov, SK Pal, M Agrawal, J Desai, A Petrik, N Buchholz, MV Maroclo, S Gordon and A Sridhar. Classification and standardized reporting of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) consensus statements. Minerva Urology and Nephrology 2022; 74(1), 110-118.

[8] F Tamborino, R Cicchetti, M Mascitti, G Litterio, A Orsini, S Ferretti, M Basconi, AD Palma, M Ferro, M Marchioni and L Schips. Pathophysiology and main molecular mechanisms of urinary stone formation and recurrence. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024; 25(5), 3075.

[9] EAH Allam. Urolithiasis unveiled: Pathophysiology, stone dynamics, types, and inhibitory mechanisms: A review. African Journal of Urology 2024; 30(1), 34.

[10] G Zeng and W Zhu. Urolithiasis: From pathogenesis to management (part one). Asian Journal of Urology 2023; 10(3), 213-214.

[11] G Zeng and W Zhu and R Huang. Urolithiasis: From pathogenesis to management (part two). Asian Journal of Urology 2024; 11(2), 137-138.

[12] A Razi, A Ghiaei, FK Dolatabadi and R Haghighi. Unraveling the association of bacteria and urinary stones in patients with urolithiasis: An update review article. Frontiers in Medicine 2024; 11, 1401808.

[13] V Jahrreiss, C Seitz and F Quhal. Medical management of urolithiasis: Great efforts and limited progress. Asian Journal of Urology 2024; 11(2), 149-155.

[14] MA Chakra, AE Dellis, AG Papatsoris and M Moussa. Established and recent developments in the pharmacological management of urolithiasis: An overview of the current treatment armamentarium. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 2020; 21(1), 85-96.

[15] SH Moosavi-Asil, M Dadmehr, F Tabrizian and M Shirzad. A review on management of urolithiasis in medieval persia. Urology 2020; 138, 1-4.

[16] DM Ng, M Haleem, A Mamuchashvili, KY Wang, JF Pan, Y Cheng and Q Ma. Medical evaluation and pharmacotherapeutical strategies in management of urolithiasis. Therapeutic Advances in Urology 2021; 13, 1756287221993300.

[17] T Yasui, A Okada, S Hamamoto, R Ando, K Taguchi, K Tozawa and K Kohri. Pathophysiologybased treatment of urolithiasis. International Journal of Urology. 2017; 24(1), 32-8.

[18] RM Geraghty, NF Davis, L Tzelves, R Lombardo, C Yuan, K Thomas, A Petrik, A Neisius, C Turk, G Gambaro and A Skolarikos. Best practice in interventional management of urolithiasis: An update from the european association of urology guidelines panel for urolithiasis 2022. European Urology Focus 2023; 9(1), 199-208.

[19] P Jiang, L Xie, R Arada, RM Patel, J Landman and RV Clayman. Qualitative review of clinical guidelines for medical and surgical management of urolithiasis: consensus and controversy 2020. Journal of Urology 2021; 205(4), 999-1008.

[20] G Zeng, W Zhu and W Lam. Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Its role in the treatment of urolithiasis and our experience. Asian journal of urology 2018; 5(4), 295-302.

[21] M Desai, Y Sun, N Buchholz, A Fuller, T Matsuda, B Matlaga, N Miller, D Bolton, M Alomar and A Ganpule. Treatment selection for urolithiasis: Percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring. World journal of urology 2017; 35(9), 1395-1399.

[22] S Gorain, S Barik, M Mandal, M Patra, AK Rajwar, D Gope and SJ Biswas. Traditional herbal remedies used in the management of urolithiasis by the tribals of Purulia District, West Bengal, India. Springer Nature, Chennai, India, 2024.

[23] Q Jiang, C Dong, Z He, Y Wang, R Jiang, W Liao and S Yang. Research landscape and pharmacological mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicines in treating and preventing urolithiasis: Unearthing an anti-urolithic treasure trove. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2024; 334, 118502.

[24] V Butterweck and SR Khan. Herbal medicines in the management of urolithiasis: Alternative or complementary?  Planta Medica 2009; 75(10), 1095-1103.

[25] KG Ingale, PA Thakurdesai and NS Vyawahare. Effect of hygrophila spinosa in ethylene glycol induced nephrolithiasis in rats. Indian journal of pharmacology 2012; 44(5), 639-642.

[26] K Diyya, V Gummadi and G Battu. Pharmacognosy of ecbolium viride: A review. International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research 2014; 6(1), 45-52.

[27] M Moghimi, V Farzaneh and H Bakhshabadi. The effect of ultrasound pretreatment on some selected physicochemical properties of black cumin (Nigella Sativa). Nutrire 2018; 43(1), 18.

[28] KR Khandelwal. Practical pharmacognosy. Pragati Books Pvt. Ltd., Maharashtra, India, 2008.

[29] JB Harborne. Phytochemical methods: A guide to modern techniques of plant analysis. Springer Nature, South Holland, Netherlands, 1998.

[30] R Roghini and K Vijayalakshmi. Phytochemical screening, quantitative analysis of flavonoids and minerals in ethanolic extract of Citrus paradisi. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 2018; 9(11), 4859-4864.

[31] RP Cook. Reactions of steroids with acetic anhydride and sulphuric acid (the liebermann-burchard test). Analyst 1961; 86(1023), 373-381.

[32] V Balamurugan, FMA Sheerin and S Velurajan. A guide to phytochemical analysis. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education 2019; 5(1), 236-245.

[33] KS Banu and L Cathrine. General techniques involved in phytochemical analysis. International journal of advanced research in chemical science 2015; 2(4), 25-32.

[34] KP Ingle, AG Deshmukh, DA Padole, MS Dudhare, MP Moharil and VC Khelurkar. Phytochemicals: Extraction methods, identification and detection of bioactive compounds from plant extracts. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017; 6(1), 32-36.

[35] N Ghedadba, L Hambaba, A Ayachi, MC Aberkane, H Bousselsela and SM Oueld-Mokhtar. Polyphenolstotaux, activitesantioxydante et antimicrobienne des extraits des feuilles de Marrubiumdeserti de Noe. Phytotherapie 2015; 13(2), 118-129.

[36] K Lee and D Kim. In-silico molecular binding prediction for human drug targets using deep neural multi-task learning. Genes 2019; 10(11), 906.

[37] SM Ali, H Helina, SV Kumar, E Varshini, KM Ahmad and H Rajamohamed. Novel drug repurposing strategy as an alternative therapeutic concept for scrub typhus using computational studies. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology 2024; 18(2), 1167-1176.

[38] GW Drach, S Thorson and A Randolph. Effects of urinary organic macromolecules on crystallization of calcium oxalate: enhancement of nucleation. The Journal of Urology 1980; 123(4), 519-523.

[39] F Atmani, Y Slimani, M Mimouni and B Hacht. Prophylaxis of calcium oxalate stones by Herniariahirsuta on experimentally induced nephrolithiasis in rats. BJU international 2003; 92(1), 137-140.

[40] S Raj, MS Rajan, S Ramasamy, RI Goldy, R Ariyamuthu, M Sudhagar, S Gandhi, P Shoba and M Gurusamy. An in vitro anti-urolithiasis activity of a herbal formulation: Spinacia oleracea L. and coriandrum sativum L. Clinical Complementary Medicine and Pharmacology 2024; 4(1), 100124.

[41] Q Zhang, L Lin and Y Wen-Cai. Techniques for extraction and isolation of natural products: A comprehensive review. Chinese Medicine 2018; 13, 20.

[42] D Karamakar and P Patki. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of a herbal formulation cystone in the management of urolithiasis: Meta-analysis of 50 clinical studies. International Journal of Alternative Medicine 2010; 8, 1-8.

[43] D Palaniyamma and R Jeyaraman. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of a herbal formulation cystone forte in the management of urolithiasis. Journal of Urology and Research 2017; 4(4), 1093.

[44] R Kachkoul, GB Touimi, GE Mouhri, RE Habbani and A Lahrichi. Pathophysiological aspects of renal stone formation and stone types. Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 2023; 15(1), 1-16.

[45] N Kulkarni, N Kapse, R Pachori and P Sadar. Studies on inhibition of calcium oxalate crystallisation by using plant extract and soil microflora. European Journal Pharmaceutical and Medical Research 2017; 4(8), 329-334.

[46] S Saha and RJ Verma. Inhibitissson of calcium oxalate crystallisation in vitro by an extract of Bergenia ciliata. Arab journal of urology 2013; 11(2), 187-192.